Is software built with AI worse?
Not if the person driving knows what good looks like. I test everything, I deploy it, and I am the one on the phone when it breaks. Ask any agency what their junior developer wrote last week and you will get a much vaguer answer.
What AI actually changes
Typing. The slow, expensive, repetitive part of building software got fast. A screen that took two days takes an afternoon. A change that took a week takes an hour.
That is a real change and it is the reason one person can quote days instead of months. It is not a trick and I am not hiding it.
What it does not change
Judgement. AI will happily build the wrong thing beautifully. Knowing what your business actually needs, knowing what to leave out, and knowing when the answer is not software at all, is still the entire job.
That is why the call comes first. If software is not the fix for what is slowing you down, I will say so on that call and it costs you nothing.
The comparison nobody makes
The real question is not AI versus a human. It is who is accountable for the result.
At a shop of ten, the person who took your call is usually not the person building it, and the person building it may be the most junior developer available that sprint. Nobody frames that as a quality risk, but it is the same risk people worry about with AI: work you did not see, from someone you did not talk to.
With me there is one person to ask. I test it, I deploy it, and I am the one who picks up the phone when something breaks.
Fair questions to ask me
Did you test this. What happens when it breaks. Can another developer read this code. Who do I call.
Those are the right questions for any developer, AI or not. I would rather you ask them than assume.
Related questions
Still have a question? Call (540) 395-6493 and ask. If software is not the fix for what is slowing your business down, I will tell you that on the call and it costs you nothing. More on what I build and how a build runs.